Two splendid rants in the online sphere this week. . . .
In The New Republic, Richard Taruskin peruses a recent stack of classical music books and questions whether it's possible to defend classical music without resort to "pious tommyrot, double standards, false dichotomies, smug nostalgia, utopian delusions, social snobbery, tautology, hypocrisy, trivialization, pretense, innuendo, reactionary invective, or imperial haberdashery." (Warning – long article.)
From the unlikely source of The Huffington Post, a blog entry on program notes, and the impenetrability thereof. Ivan Katz asks, "Am I the only one who has noticed that the program notes provided to concert goers are, in the main, so badly written as to be embarrassing?" In this, Minnesotans may be spoiled – when I think of program notes, I think of the stylish and readable efforts by Michael Steinberg, Mary Ann Feldman, and others. But your results may vary – read on.
Love the music?
Show your support by making a gift to YourClassical.
Each day, we’re here for you with thoughtful streams that set the tone for your day – not to mention the stories and programs that inspire you to new discovery and help you explore the music you love.
YourClassical is available for free, because we are listener-supported public media. Take a moment to make your gift today.